Archived - Notes for an address at the Symposium on the Contribution of the Honourable Michel Bastarache

This page has been archived on the Web.

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Moncton, May 4, 2010
Graham Fraser - Commissioner of Official Languages

Check against delivery


Footnote 1

Michel Bastarache, Comment se donner plus de droits en matière de droits linguistiques? (in French only), notes for an address at the Forum on Language Rights in Manitoba, Saint-Boniface, October 18, 2008, p. 3. on-line version consulted April 28, 2010.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

Honda Canada Inc. v Keays (2008) 2 S.C.R. 362 2008 SCC 39, para 62.

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

Michel Bastarache, "Discours de clôture/Closing Address" in Braën, Foucher and Le Bouthillier, dir. Languages, Constitutionalism and Minorities / Langues, constitutionnalisme et minorités, Markham, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006, p. 701.

Return to footnote 3 referrer

Footnote 4

Michel Bastarache, Protection des langues et protection des minorités linguistiques : deux objectifs distincts faisant appel à des moyens différents, address at the Symposium for the 10th Anniversary of the Official Languages Act of 1988, Ottawa, September 17, 1998.

Return to footnote 4 referrer

Footnote 5

House of Commons, Legislative Committee on C-72, An Act respecting the status and use of the official languages of Canada, Minutes of Proceedings, 2nd Session, 33rd Parliament, 28 April 1988, p. 7:32.

Return to footnote 5 referrer

Footnote 6

Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217, para. 74.

Return to footnote 6 referrer

Footnote 7

Graham Fraser, "Les retombées de l’avis de la Cour suprême", Le Devoir, September 10, 1998.

Return to footnote 7 referrer

Footnote 8

Dunmore v Ontario (Attorney General), (2001) 3 S.C.R. 1016, 2001 S.C.C. 94, para 16.

Return to footnote 8 referrer

Footnote 9

Dunmore v Ontario (Attorney General), (2001) 3 S.C.R. 1016, 2001 S.C.C. 94, para 17.

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Footnote 10

Michel Bastarache and Andréa Ouellet, La portée juridique de la partie VII de la Loi sur les langues officielles du Canada, Ottawa, publisher not available, September 1991, p. 32.

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Footnote 11

Canadian Western Bank v Alberta (2007) 2 S.C.R.; para 111.

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Footnote 12

Honda Canada Inc. v Keays, (2008) 2. S.C.R. 362, 2008, SCC 39; para 43.

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Footnote 13

Nicholas Kasirer, “Foreword,” in Michel Bastarache, The Law of Bilingual Interpretation, Markham, LexisNexis Canada Inc., 2008, p. ix.

Return to footnote 13 referrer

Footnote 14

Michel Bastarache, Bijuralism and Harmonization: Genesis, at a lunch-and-learn workshop on bijuralism and judicial authority at the Department of Justice, Ottawa, February 4, 2000.

Return to footnote 14 referrer

Date modified: